Twitter’s IPA”: The Rise of Trade Secrets and the End of Innovation
Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 10:30
Written by dbhalling Wednesday, 18 April 2012 10:30 |
Twitter posted their Innovators Patent Agreement (IPA) https://github.com/twitter/innovators-patent-agreement/blob/master/innovators-patent-agreement.md with much ballyhoo yesterday. Despite the claim that Twitter will only assert patents defensively, part 2(b) of the IPA allows Twitter to assert patents against anyone who has asserted their patents. This will only exclude a very few companies, mainly startups. Twitter’s stated goal is to promote innovation, but the real result if Twitter is successful will be that companies will rely on Trade Secrets. Trade secrets decrease innovation, because the information is not shared. Inventors cannot build on the work of previous inventors and they are more likely to waste resources rediscovering other people’s work (reinventing the wheel). History clearly shows that when a country relies on trade secrets instead of patents, innovation is impeded. Those countries with weak or nonexistent patent systems are not innovators and their people live on the edge of starvation.
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Subscriber Count
Recent Comments
- dbhalling on UN to Spend Trillions Trying to Create a Perpetual Motion Machine
- step back on UN to Spend Trillions Trying to Create a Perpetual Motion Machine
- dbhalling on Twitter’s IPA”: The Rise of Trade Secrets and the End of Innovation
- Patrick on Twitter’s IPA”: The Rise of Trade Secrets and the End of Innovation
- We're Number 1, We're Number 1 in Taxes | Blog of Dale B. Halling, LLC - Intellectual Property & Patent Innovation, Attorney - Powered by Clvr.Tv on Austerity: Why it is Key for Both Short Term and Long Term Economic Growth
Recent Posts
- UN to Spend Trillions Trying to Create a Perpetual Motion Machine
- Prometheus Fall Out: The SmartGene Case
- Twitter’s IPA”: The Rise of Trade Secrets and the End of Innovation
- Mark Cuban’s a Mythical Patent Creature
- How Do You Determine if it Makes Economic Sense to File a Patent?
- We’re Number 1, We’re Number 1 in Taxes
- Wall Street Journal Proves its Patent Ignorance
- JOBS Act a Small Step in Right Direction
- Supreme Court ‘Only Black Magic Patent Eligible’
- Singapore and the US Divergent Patent Policies
It’s a PR move, plain and simple. Consider this: twitter is already generally known to have failed to seek IP protection shortly after its inception, most likely rendering any patents sought now extremely weak due to intervening prior art.
However, the IPA would not apply to any patents acquired from secondary markets, which would be the only place they are likely to obtain patents sufficient to protect the core product.
Interesting point