Sarbanes Oxley: Relief May Be on the Way
Last Updated on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 02:57
Written by dbhalling Tuesday, 1 November 2011 02:57 |

I wrote about the damaging effects of Sarbanes Oxley in my book, The Decline and Fall of the American Entrepreneur. It appears that the Republican presidential candidates have read my book. See this video, J. W. Verret Discusses Sarbanes-Oxley on Fox News, which shows the candidates explaining that we need to repeal SOX. Let’s hope that they don’t just tinker around the edges with SOX and while they are at it they need to repeal Dodd Frank. This would be a big step toward restoring innovation and getting the economy growing again.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 1st, 2011 at 2:57 pm and is filed under Innovation, Regulatory bill of Rights. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Subscriber Count
7
Recent Comments
- dbhalling on The Science of Economic Growth: Part 4
- step back on The Science of Economic Growth: Part 4
- dbhalling on A Christmas Tale: ‘I Am My Brother’s Keeper’ – and How it Applied to Patents
- step back on A Christmas Tale: ‘I Am My Brother’s Keeper’ – and How it Applied to Patents
- dbhalling on A Christmas Tale: ‘I Am My Brother’s Keeper’ – and How it Applied to Patents
Recent Posts
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 5
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 4
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 3
- A Christmas Tale: ‘I Am My Brother’s Keeper’ – and How it Applied to Patents
- Long Term Economic Predictions 2011
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 2
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 1
- The History of Patent Damages
- Repeal of Sarbanes Oxley and Dodd Frank Proposed
- Justice Breyer: Patent Ignorance
Advertise Here
Donations
Coming Soon
Tags
35 USC 101 America Invents Act atlas shrugged Ayn Rand David Kline economic growth Economics economy Edison first-to-file first-to-invent H.R. 1249 Henry R. Nothhaft Innovation innovation economics innovation policy Intellectual property Intellectual Property Innovation invent invention IP IPO jobs Mayo v. Prometheus Pat Choate patent patent law patent office patent policy patent reform Patents per capita income President Obama S.23 Sarbanes Oxley software patents source of economic growth SOX start-up stock market supreme court technology uspto Venture Capital von mises
I was just thinking about how some big corporations support patent reform and they argue that they need to protect the huge investment they make in research and development. I find it to be dishonest because the barriers to entry into tech businesses are huge. Just because I think up a new widget or chemical doesn’t mean I have the ability to start a factory, adhere to all product safety regulations, distribute the product, market the product, give customer support, and so on. The lone inventor still needs the large corporation in order to overcome those obstacles. Patents are not enough to put someone out of business.
Matthew, I would argue that the lone inventor needs access to capital. There are three broad things that effect an inventor’s access to capital: 1) a strong and efficient patent system, 2) access to venture capital, and 3) the governmental tax and regulatory burden. SOX has affected access to venture capital (here I do not mean just institutional VCs) because the cost of going public make it much less likely as an exit strategy. This means that investors have to stay in investments longer and startups do not get enough capital to grow fast.