Death of Angel Capital
Last Updated on Monday, 26 April 2010 09:45
Written by dbhalling Monday, 26 April 2010 09:45 |

According to the Wall Street Journal:
Senator Chris Dodd’s 1,400-page financial reform bill contains many economic land mines, and here’s one of the worst: Provisions that would make it harder for business start-ups to raise seed capital. Currently, wealthy individuals who want to invest directly in a new business can do so with minimum interference from regulators. The law requires only that the investor be “accredited” by meeting thresholds for net worth ($1 million) or income ($250,000). Entrepreneurs depend on these “angel” investors, since many new businesses lack the collateral for bank loans and are too small to interest venture capitalists.
Mr. Dodd’s bill would change all this for the worse. Most preposterously, it would require that start-ups seeking angel investments file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and endure a 120-day review. Rare is the new company that doesn’t need immediate access to the capital it raises, and a four-month delay is the kind of rule popular in banana republics that create few new businesses.The legislation also removes a federal pre-emption that prevents start-ups and investors from being subject to 50 different state regulators. The North American Securities Administrators Association, which represents state regulators, argues that federal pre-emption contributes to fraud. But angel investors don’t use broker-dealers and other middlemen linked to recent investment scandals. Nascent companies often seek financing from multiple investors in different states, and a state-by-state regulatory regime would mean higher compliance costs and more legal risks.The Dodd bill also raises the net worth and income thresholds to $2.3 million and $450,000, respectively. The Angel Capital Association, a trade group, estimates that these provisions would disqualify about 77% of current accredited investors. Accreditation matters in luring other potential investors, such as venture capitalists who enter the picture once a company begins to mature.
Please see the full Article
Tags: Angle capital, Chris Dodd, economic growth, Financial Reform, innovation economics, innovation policy, Sarbanes Oxley
This entry was posted on Monday, April 26th, 2010 at 9:45 am and is filed under Innovation, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Subscriber Count
7
Recent Comments
Recent Posts
- A Christmas Tale: ‘I Am My Brother’s Keeper’ – and How it Applied to Patents
- Long Term Economic Predictions 2011
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 2
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 1
- The History of Patent Damages
- Repeal of Sarbanes Oxley and Dodd Frank Proposed
- Justice Breyer: Patent Ignorance
- New Ex-Parte Appeals Rules from the USPTO
- Mark Twain’s Birthday: Thoughts on Patents
- US Brain Drain
Advertise Here
Donations
Coming Soon
Tags
35 USC 101 America Invents Act atlas shrugged Ayn Rand David Kline economic growth Economics economy Edison first-to-file first-to-invent H.R. 1249 Henry R. Nothhaft Innovation innovation economics innovation policy Intellectual property Intellectual Property Innovation invent invention IP IPO jobs Mayo v. Prometheus Pat Choate patent patent law patent office patent policy patent reform Patents per capita income President Obama S.23 Sarbanes Oxley software patents source of economic growth SOX start-up stock market supreme court technology uspto Venture Capital von mises
Recent Comments
- dbhalling on The Science of Economic Growth: Part 2
- step back on The Science of Economic Growth: Part 2
- dbhalling on The Science of Economic Growth: Part 2
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dale Halling. Dale Halling said: Death of Angel Capital : http://wp.me/pwxHH-eo [...]