Twitter’s IPA”: The Rise of Trade Secrets and the End of Innovation
Twitter posted their Innovators Patent Agreement (IPA) https://github.com/twitter/innovators-patent-agreement/blob/master/innovators-patent-agreement.md with much ballyhoo yesterday. Despite the claim that Twitter will only assert patents defensively, part 2(b) of the IPA allows Twitter to assert patents against anyone who has asserted their patents. This will only exclude a very few companies, mainly startups. Twitter’s stated goal is to promote innovation, but the real result if Twitter is successful will be that companies will rely on Trade Secrets. Trade secrets decrease innovation, because the information is not shared. Inventors cannot build on the work of previous inventors and they are more likely to waste resources rediscovering other people’s work (reinventing the wheel). History clearly shows that when a country relies on trade secrets instead of patents, innovation is impeded. Those countries with weak or nonexistent patent systems are not innovators and their people live on the edge of starvation.
3 Comments »
Leave a Reply
About
This blog is focuses on economics, invention, and the law from a Natural Rights and Objectivist point of view.
Donations are greatly appreciated
3P2ucbxCyztJ56Sm2EW1gN44tSnWqUBvnj
-
Archives
- October 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (7)
- December 2016 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (3)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
It’s a PR move, plain and simple. Consider this: twitter is already generally known to have failed to seek IP protection shortly after its inception, most likely rendering any patents sought now extremely weak due to intervening prior art.
However, the IPA would not apply to any patents acquired from secondary markets, which would be the only place they are likely to obtain patents sufficient to protect the core product.
Comment by Patrick | April 18, 2012 |
Interesting point
Comment by dbhalling | April 18, 2012 |
[…] B. Halling warns in State of Innovation that “[t]rade secrets decrease innovation, because the information is not shared. Inventors […]
Pingback by Innovator’s Patent Agreement: Twitter’s Defensive Patenting Strategy | JOLT Digest | August 11, 2013 |