More on the Myth that Patents are Monopolies
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 30 September 2010 08:50
Written by dbhalling Thursday, 30 September 2010 08:50 |
David Kline, author of Rembrandts in the Attic, has added the following insight from history on the idea that patents are monopolies.
“The condemnation of monopolies ought not to extend to patents, by which the originator of a new process is permitted to enjoy, for a limited period, the exclusive privilege of using his own improvement. This is not making the commodity dearer for his benefit, but merely postponing a part of the increased cheapness (or excellence) which the public owe to the inventor,
in order to compensate and reward him for his service.”
John Stuart Mill, “Principles of Political Economy,” 1848
“The dawn of the right of inventors has been actually [contemporaneous] with the destruction of monopolies odious to the common justice of men; and the common sense of mankind has marked a distinction between such monopolies and the exclusive rights conceded to inventors. Their rights, under patents, are called ‘monopolies’ only from the poverty of language, which has failed to express in words a distinction which no less clearly exists.”
Louis Wolowski, Chair of Industrial Economics, Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers, 1864
“How can the exclusive right of an invention be compared with a monopoly in trade? How can the exclusive privilege to sell salt in Elizabeth’s time, which added not one bushel to the production, but which enriched the monopolist and robbed the community, and the exclusive right of Whitney to his cotton gin, which has added hundreds of millions to the products and exports of the country, be both branded, with equal justice, with the odious name of monopoly?”
George H. Knight, 1891
A patent is a property right, it is not a monopoly. For more information see The Myth That Patents are Monopoly.
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Subscriber Count
Recent Comments
- Exodus: How the US is Losing Its Most Talent People | Blog of Dale B. Halling, LLC - Intellectual Property & Patent Innovation, Attorney - Powered by Clvr.Tv on US Brain Drain
- dbhalling on Food Stamps’ Multiplier Effect: Economic Voodoo
- Rob on Food Stamps’ Multiplier Effect: Economic Voodoo
- Rob on Food Stamps’ Multiplier Effect: Economic Voodoo
- dbhalling on JOBS Act a Small Step in Right Direction
Recent Posts
- Exodus: How the US is Losing Its Most Talented People
- Does 1.6% Growth in Patents Qualify as an Explosion?
- Foundations of Patent Law
- UN to Spend Trillions Trying to Create a Perpetual Motion Machine
- Prometheus Fall Out: The SmartGene Case
- Twitter’s IPA”: The Rise of Trade Secrets and the End of Innovation
- Mark Cuban’s a Mythical Patent Creature
- How Do You Determine if it Makes Economic Sense to File a Patent?
- We’re Number 1, We’re Number 1 in Taxes
- Wall Street Journal Proves its Patent Ignorance


[...] Property Rights: Mr. Johnson does not seem to understand the basis of property rights or the difference between property rights and monopolies. He incorrectly states that patents and copyrights are monopolies. Patents and Copyrights are property rights and any definition of monopoly that includes patents also includes all property rights. This of course leads to the nonsense that all property rights are monopolies. For more information see The Myth That Patent are Monopolies. [...]