America Invents Act Will Increase Patent Application Backlog and Will Not Encourage Innovation or Job Creation!
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 2 April 2011 02:30
Written by dbhalling Saturday, 2 April 2011 02:30 |
This is a Press Release from American Innovators for Patent Reform and Eight Other Organizations Send Letter to Congress Stating Objections to House Version of America Invents Act:
|
|
|
4 Comments
Leave a Reply
Subscriber Count
Recent Comments
- Exodus: How the US is Losing Its Most Talent People | Blog of Dale B. Halling, LLC - Intellectual Property & Patent Innovation, Attorney - Powered by Clvr.Tv on US Brain Drain
- dbhalling on Food Stamps’ Multiplier Effect: Economic Voodoo
- Rob on Food Stamps’ Multiplier Effect: Economic Voodoo
- Rob on Food Stamps’ Multiplier Effect: Economic Voodoo
- dbhalling on JOBS Act a Small Step in Right Direction
Recent Posts
- Exodus: How the US is Losing Its Most Talented People
- Does 1.6% Growth in Patents Qualify as an Explosion?
- Foundations of Patent Law
- UN to Spend Trillions Trying to Create a Perpetual Motion Machine
- Prometheus Fall Out: The SmartGene Case
- Twitter’s IPA”: The Rise of Trade Secrets and the End of Innovation
- Mark Cuban’s a Mythical Patent Creature
- How Do You Determine if it Makes Economic Sense to File a Patent?
- We’re Number 1, We’re Number 1 in Taxes
- Wall Street Journal Proves its Patent Ignorance


I agree that it doesn’t seem to make an incredible amount of sense to include in this patent reform bill numerous provisions that are simultaneously significant and controversial. Since the PTO’s backlog is today’s main patent law concern, and there is apparently universal agreement as to fee diversion and fee-setting authority, it would make most sense to focus on getting the office the funding that it needs to tackle the backlog, and then just getting out of the way.
http://www.genengnews.com/gen-articles/watson-the-pto-needs-you/3611/
hear hear!
Here’s one for your grind (‘yer teeth) mill:
http://blogs.forbes.com/leapfrogging/2011/04/07/googles-conundrum-buy-the-patents-or-pay-the-lawyers/
A Forbes blogger claims:
“There is no proof that allowing patents to last seventeen years, rather than five or ten, does any good. It may grant too much monopoly power. “
Thanks for cheering me up.