<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding the Non-Obviousness (35 USC 103) Patent Requirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hallingblog.com/2009/08/12/understanding-the-non-obviousness-35-usc-103-patent-requirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hallingblog.com/2009/08/12/understanding-the-non-obviousness-35-usc-103-patent-requirement/</link>
	<description>Patents and Innovation Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explaining Patent Law Through the Lens of Natural Rights &#171; State of Innovation</title>
		<link>http://hallingblog.com/2009/08/12/understanding-the-non-obviousness-35-usc-103-patent-requirement/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Explaining Patent Law Through the Lens of Natural Rights &#171; State of Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hallingblog.com/?p=201#comment-352</guid>
		<description>[...] step” in Europe) has caused all sorts of mischief by the courts.  For more information see Understanding the Nonobviousness Requirement and Obviousness – Flow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] step” in Europe) has caused all sorts of mischief by the courts.  For more information see Understanding the Nonobviousness Requirement and Obviousness – Flow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obviousness &#8211; Flow Chart &#171; State of Innovation</title>
		<link>http://hallingblog.com/2009/08/12/understanding-the-non-obviousness-35-usc-103-patent-requirement/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Obviousness &#8211; Flow Chart &#171; State of Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hallingblog.com/?p=201#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] is my second post on the nonobviousness standard for patents (35 USC 103).  The earlier post focused on the practical questions that an inventor and his attorney face when negotiating with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is my second post on the nonobviousness standard for patents (35 USC 103).  The earlier post focused on the practical questions that an inventor and his attorney face when negotiating with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
