Archive for June 22nd, 2009
A number of scholars[1] have suggested that the logical basis for tangible property rights is scarcity. Property rights efficiently allocate these resources and avoid conflicts between competing rights of individuals. These scholars argue that ideas and invention are not subject to scarcity and therefore intellectual property rights should not exist. These arguments seem to be particularly prevalent among Libertarians, including the Cato Institute and Von Mises Institute, and the open source community.
Subscriber Count
7
Recent Posts
- CATO & Reason Demonstrate Ignorance of Property Rights – Patents
- SOPA, PIPA and Kim Dotcom
- H.R.2930 Crowdfunding Passes House
- Book Review: It Is Dangerous to Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom
- Obama’s Fundamental Change Means – US is No Longer the LAND OF THE FREE
- Book Review: Why America Has Stopped Inventing?
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 5
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 4
- The Science of Economic Growth: Part 3
- A Christmas Tale: ‘I Am My Brother’s Keeper’ – and How it Applied to Patents
Advertise Here
Your Ad
could be right
HERE
find out howDonations
Coming Soon
Tags
35 USC 101
Adam Mossoff
America Invents Act
atlas shrugged
Ayn Rand
cato institute
David Kline
economic growth
Economics
economy
Edison
first-to-file
first-to-invent
H.R. 1249
Henry R. Nothhaft
Innovation
innovation economics
innovation policy
Intellectual property
Intellectual Property Innovation
invent
invention
IP
IPO
jobs
Pat Choate
patent
patent law
patent office
patent policy
patent reform
Patents
per capita income
President Obama
S.23
Sarbanes Oxley
software patents
source of economic growth
SOX
start-up
stock market
supreme court
technology
uspto
Venture Capital
Recent Comments