Scarcity – Does it Prove Intellectual Property is Unjustified?
A number of scholars[1] have suggested that the logical basis for tangible property rights is scarcity. Property rights efficiently allocate these resources and avoid conflicts between competing rights of individuals. These scholars argue that ideas and invention are not subject to scarcity and therefore intellectual property rights should not exist. These arguments seem to be particularly prevalent among Libertarians, including the Cato Institute and Von Mises Institute, and the open source community. Read more »
-
Recent
- The US Economy and the State of Innovation
- Rent Seeking and Patents
- Open Question to David Kappos & Trademark Community
- Makeup of the CAFC
- Invention – A Financial Analysis
- What is the Economic Impact of Start-ups?
- Restore Patent Funding to Create Jobs
- Another Study Shows Value of Patents
- Are Patents Relevant?
- The Rational Optimist: Excellent Book, Disfigured by Open Source Utopianism
- American Inventors for Patent Reform
- Job Growth Due to Start-Ups
-
Links
-
Archives
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (8)
- July 2010 (7)
- June 2010 (6)
- May 2010 (10)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (13)
- February 2010 (16)
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (12)
- November 2009 (9)
- October 2009 (11)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
